Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mid Minnesota Federal Credit Union vs Crow Wing Power Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mid Minnesota Federal Credit Union | Crow Wing Power Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 | 71 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 43 | 44 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 86 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 66 (stronger) | 58 |
| Funding & liquidity | 68 | 77 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 41st | 54th |
| Total assets | $858.0M | $126.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $766.9M | $113.8M |
| Capital ratio | 9.30% | 9.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.43% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.24% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.15% (stronger) | 0.95% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 92.3% | 83.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.1% (stronger) | 9.2% |
| Offices | 6 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Crow Wing Power Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mid Minnesota Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Crow Wing Power Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.