TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Middlesex Savings Bank vs Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Middlesex Savings Bank

Natick, Massachusetts · $1 billion – $10 billion

79of 100
Strong

Credit union

Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union

Leominster, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMiddlesex Savings BankLeominster Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7980 (stronger)
Capital cushion84 (stronger)62
Loan quality89100 (stronger)
Earnings4956 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity80100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage97100 (stronger)
Peer percentile88th65th
Total assets$6.1B$30.0M
Deposits / shares$5.2B$26.4M
Capital ratio13.44% (stronger)11.20%
Problem loans0.33%0.01% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.01%-0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets0.72%0.90% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits72.5%53.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits22.4%0.3% (stronger)
Offices321
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)10.3%—

Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Middlesex Savings Bank leads on 1 and Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions