TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Middletown Area Schools Credit Union vs Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc.

Credit union

Middletown Area Schools Credit Union

Middletown, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc.

Beavercreek, Ohio · $1 billion – $10 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureMiddletown Area Schools Credit UnionWright-Patt Credit Union, Inc.
TellerScore84 (stronger)68
Capital cushion100 (stronger)63
Loan quality64 (stronger)63
Earnings74 (stronger)65
Funding & liquidity93 (stronger)77
Problem-loan coverage92 (stronger)85
Peer percentile75th50th
Total assets$11.3M$9.5B
Deposits / shares$9.6M$8.2B
Capital ratio15.20% (stronger)11.32%
Problem loans1.09% (stronger)1.10%
Net charge-offs0.13% (stronger)1.07%
Return on assets1.35% (stronger)1.14%
Loans ÷ deposits67.3% (stronger)83.7%
Uninsured deposits3.8% (stronger)7.9%
Offices226
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—34.1%

Middletown Area Schools Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Middletown Area Schools Credit Union leads on 7 and Wright-Patt Credit Union, Inc. on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions