TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated vs First Alliance Credit Union

Bank

Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated

Rochester, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

76of 100
Strong

Credit union

First Alliance Credit Union

Rochester, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureMinnesota First Credit and Savings, IncorporatedFirst Alliance Credit Union
TellerScore76 (stronger)67
Capital cushion92 (stronger)49
Loan quality96 (stronger)60
Earnings3291 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity5473 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)82
Peer percentile56th41st
Total assets$29.9M$358.5M
Deposits / shares$24.9M$296.0M
Capital ratio14.16% (stronger)9.95%
Problem loans0.12% (stronger)1.19%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.53%
Return on assets0.31%1.77% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits106.4%87.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.2% (stronger)4.5%
Offices47
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—43.6%

Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Minnesota First Credit and Savings, Incorporated leads on 5 and First Alliance Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions