TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Minnesota Power Employees Credit Union vs Indianhead Credit Union

Credit union

Minnesota Power Employees Credit Union

Duluth, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

72of 100
Strong

Credit union

Indianhead Credit Union

Spooner, Wisconsin · $100 million – $1 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMinnesota Power Employees Credit UnionIndianhead Credit Union
TellerScore7286 (stronger)
Capital cushion97100 (stronger)
Loan quality3674 (stronger)
Earnings7482 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity7578 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8193 (stronger)
Peer percentile57th89th
Total assets$161.9M$101.2M
Deposits / shares$135.9M$83.5M
Capital ratio14.66%14.98% (stronger)
Problem loans1.92%0.78% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.04% (stronger)0.07%
Return on assets1.34%1.55% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits85.3%82.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.2%1.9% (stronger)
Offices23
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—9.5%

Indianhead Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Minnesota Power Employees Credit Union leads on 1 and Indianhead Credit Union on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions