Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mississippi National Guard Federal Credit Union vs Camp Shelby Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Mississippi National Guard Federal Credit Union
Jackson, Mississippi · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Camp Shelby Federal Credit Union
Hattiesburg, Mississippi · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mississippi National Guard Federal Credit Union | Camp Shelby Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 58 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 38 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 49 | 72 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 71 (stronger) | 64 |
| Funding & liquidity | 85 | 93 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 75 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 19th | 75th |
| Total assets | $43.5M | $31.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $40.7M | $23.9M |
| Capital ratio | 8.76% | 23.89% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.53% | 0.83% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.57% (stronger) | 0.77% |
| Return on assets | 1.28% (stronger) | 1.11% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 75.6% | 66.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.2% | 1.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Camp Shelby Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mississippi National Guard Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Camp Shelby Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.