Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Montana Federal Credit Union vs Horizon Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Montana Federal Credit Union | Horizon Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 75 |
| Capital cushion | 75 | 81 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 91 | 91 |
| Earnings | 59 (stronger) | 46 |
| Funding & liquidity | 82 (stronger) | 61 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 95 |
| Peer percentile | 76th | 75th |
| Total assets | $361.5M | $2.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $316.7M | $1.6B |
| Capital ratio | 12.53% | 13.08% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.26% (stronger) | 0.27% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.28% (stronger) | 0.48% |
| Return on assets | 0.99% (stronger) | 0.64% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 78.3% (stronger) | 98.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 5.3% (stronger) | 8.1% |
| Offices | 4 | 27 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.8% | — |
Montana Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Montana Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Horizon Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.