TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mutual Savings Credit Union vs Genuine Parts Credit Union

Credit union

Mutual Savings Credit Union

Birmingham, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Genuine Parts Credit Union

Norcross, Georgia · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMutual Savings Credit UnionGenuine Parts Credit Union
TellerScore6587 (stronger)
Capital cushion41100 (stronger)
Loan quality94100 (stronger)
Earnings3036 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity92100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94100 (stronger)
Peer percentile34th83rd
Total assets$242.8M$19.5M
Deposits / shares$214.0M$6.2M
Capital ratio9.06%79.20% (stronger)
Problem loans0.19%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.27% (stronger)3.33%
Return on assets0.26%0.41% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits68.2%36.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits12.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices73
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)47.7%—

Genuine Parts Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mutual Savings Credit Union leads on 1 and Genuine Parts Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions