TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

NASA Federal Credit Union vs None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Credit union

NASA Federal Credit Union

Upper Marlboro, Maryland · $1 billion – $10 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Credit union

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Suitland, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNASA Federal Credit UnionNone Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6699 (stronger)
Capital cushion55100 (stronger)
Loan quality8296 (stronger)
Earnings55100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity59100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage90100 (stronger)
Peer percentile44th99th
Total assets$5.8B$27.9M
Deposits / shares$4.7B$22.3M
Capital ratio10.49%20.14% (stronger)
Problem loans0.53%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.77%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.87%2.07% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits94.6%11.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits20.8%1.9% (stronger)
Offices121
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)6.2%—

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), NASA Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions