TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Nassau Financial Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Nassau Financial Federal Credit Union

East Meadow, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

50of 100
Below average

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNassau Financial Federal Credit UnionLatvian Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5088 (stronger)
Capital cushion12100 (stronger)
Loan quality86100 (stronger)
Earnings1342 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity90100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage91100 (stronger)
Peer percentile6th85th
Total assets$334.4M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$319.1M$1.4M
Capital ratio6.20%25.25% (stronger)
Problem loans0.41%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.07%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.16%0.55% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits69.9%20.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits2.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices41
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 50). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Nassau Financial Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions