Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Native American Bank, National Association vs San Luis Valley Federal Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Native American Bank, National Association | San Luis Valley Federal Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 94 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 67 (stronger) | 65 |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 | 66 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 91st |
| Total assets | $362.0M | $390.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $302.6M | $317.9M |
| Capital ratio | 14.39% | 17.98% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.94% | 0.15% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.18% (stronger) | 1.13% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 68.7% (stronger) | 88.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 45.7% | 20.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
San Luis Valley Federal Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Native American Bank, National Association leads on 3 and San Luis Valley Federal Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.