TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

New Alliance Federal Credit Union vs Timberland Federal Credit Union

Credit union

New Alliance Federal Credit Union

Ambridge, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

54of 100
Below average

Credit union

Timberland Federal Credit Union

Dubois, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureNew Alliance Federal Credit UnionTimberland Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5468 (stronger)
Capital cushion3752 (stronger)
Loan quality3475 (stronger)
Earnings61 (stronger)52
Funding & liquidity99 (stronger)95
Problem-loan coverage7591 (stronger)
Peer percentile10th45th
Total assets$113.3M$102.0M
Deposits / shares$101.5M$91.1M
Capital ratio8.72%10.23% (stronger)
Problem loans1.97%0.76% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39% (stronger)0.40%
Return on assets1.03% (stronger)0.80%
Loans ÷ deposits61.6% (stronger)65.1%
Uninsured deposits3.9%0.7% (stronger)
Offices24
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.8%29.8%

Timberland Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New Alliance Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Timberland Federal Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions