TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Onpoint Community Credit Union

Credit union

Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union

Eugene, Oregon · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Onpoint Community Credit Union

Portland, Oregon · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePacific Cascade Federal Credit UnionOnpoint Community Credit Union
TellerScore6583 (stronger)
Capital cushion55100 (stronger)
Loan quality82 (stronger)67
Earnings1576 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)80
Problem-loan coverage95 (stronger)91
Peer percentile34th92nd
Total assets$139.9M$9.5B
Deposits / shares$123.2M$7.9B
Capital ratio10.47%15.00% (stronger)
Problem loans0.54% (stronger)0.98%
Net charge-offs0.71%0.42% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.14%1.41% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits53.9% (stronger)80.0%
Uninsured deposits3.2% (stronger)3.6%
Offices434
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)8.3%17.5%

Onpoint Community Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Onpoint Community Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions