Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Parish Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Cleveland Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Parish Federal Credit Union | Latvian Cleveland Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 85 |
| Capital cushion | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 83 (stronger) | 36 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 85 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 77th |
| Total assets | $24.0M | $28.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $20.6M | $22.3M |
| Capital ratio | 11.76% | 20.31% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.06% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.57% (stronger) | 0.40% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 53.4% (stronger) | 74.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 4.6% | 4.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Parish Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Parish Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Latvian Cleveland Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.