TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Pilgrim Cucc Federal Credit Union vs Schlumberger Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Pilgrim Cucc Federal Credit Union

Houston, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

47of 100
Below average

Credit union

Schlumberger Employees Credit Union

Sugar Land, Texas · $100 million – $1 billion

94of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePilgrim Cucc Federal Credit UnionSchlumberger Employees Credit Union
TellerScore4794 (stronger)
Capital cushion71100 (stronger)
Loan quality981 (stronger)
Earnings493 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage7799 (stronger)
Peer percentile7th98th
Total assets$1.0M$935.8M
Deposits / shares$881K$698.6M
Capital ratio12.10%25.28% (stronger)
Problem loans2.72%0.57% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.23%
Return on assets-0.41%1.81% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits60.2%39.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)12.6%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

Schlumberger Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (94 vs 47). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pilgrim Cucc Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Schlumberger Employees Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions