Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Piscataqua Savings Bank vs Profile Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Piscataqua Savings Bank | Profile Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 65 |
| Capital cushion | 87 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Earnings | 35 (stronger) | 30 |
| Funding & liquidity | 89 (stronger) | 78 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 29th |
| Total assets | $373.4M | $316.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $298.1M | $280.3M |
| Capital ratio | 13.67% (stronger) | 9.27% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 0.38% (stronger) | 0.25% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.0% (stronger) | 70.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.8% (stronger) | 25.7% |
| Offices | 1 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 19.2% | — |
Piscataqua Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Piscataqua Savings Bank leads on 7 and Profile Bank on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.