Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Piscataqua Savings Bank vs Walden Mutual Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Piscataqua Savings Bank | Walden Mutual Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 35 |
| Capital cushion | 87 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 35 (stronger) | 21 |
| Funding & liquidity | 89 (stronger) | 87 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 52 |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 1st |
| Total assets | $373.4M | $192.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $298.1M | $173.5M |
| Capital ratio | 13.67% (stronger) | 9.33% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 3.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.17% |
| Return on assets | 0.38% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.0% (stronger) | 72.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.8% | 15.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 19.2% | — |
Piscataqua Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 35). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Piscataqua Savings Bank leads on 6 and Walden Mutual Bank on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.