TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Polish & Slavic Federal Credit Union vs Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Polish & Slavic Federal Credit Union

Brooklyn, New York · $1 billion – $10 billion

73of 100
Strong

Credit union

Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union

Jamaica, New York · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePolish & Slavic Federal Credit UnionPaul Quinn Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7393 (stronger)
Capital cushion63100 (stronger)
Loan quality90100 (stronger)
Earnings4165 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity94100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage97100 (stronger)
Peer percentile70th94th
Total assets$2.7B$358K
Deposits / shares$2.5B$251K
Capital ratio11.32%26.10% (stronger)
Problem loans0.31%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.08%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.52%1.12% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits66.4%19.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits6.5%0.0% (stronger)
Offices141
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Polish & Slavic Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions