Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Cleveland Credit Union
Credit union
Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union
Conneaut, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union | Latvian Cleveland Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 85 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 79 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 1 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 25 | 36 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 85 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 80 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 11th | 77th |
| Total assets | $30.7M | $28.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $26.2M | $22.3M |
| Capital ratio | 12.89% | 20.31% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 2.98% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.24% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.13% | 0.40% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 51.8% (stronger) | 74.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.5% (stronger) | 4.0% |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Latvian Cleveland Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Latvian Cleveland Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.