Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Port Richmond Savings vs Armstrong County Building and Loan Association
Bank
Armstrong County Building and Loan Association
Ford City, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Port Richmond Savings | Armstrong County Building and Loan Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Loan quality | 68 (stronger) | 64 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 31 |
| Funding & liquidity | 30 | 81 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 88 |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 28th |
| Total assets | $97.2M | $95.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $60.8M | $82.7M |
| Capital ratio | 22.56% (stronger) | 12.50% |
| Problem loans | 0.97% (stronger) | 1.09% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.39% (stronger) | 0.27% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 143.2% | 79.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.0% | 5.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.0% |
Port Richmond Savings has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Port Richmond Savings leads on 4 and Armstrong County Building and Loan Association on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.