Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Port Richmond Savings vs Compass Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Port Richmond Savings | Compass Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 (stronger) | 51 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 23 |
| Loan quality | 68 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 7 |
| Funding & liquidity | 30 | 57 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 10th |
| Total assets | $97.2M | $53.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $60.8M | $48.2M |
| Capital ratio | 22.56% (stronger) | 7.29% |
| Problem loans | 0.97% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.39% (stronger) | -0.33% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 143.2% | 103.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.0% | 3.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Port Richmond Savings has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 51). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Port Richmond Savings leads on 3 and Compass Savings Bank on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.