Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Range Bank vs Wisconsin Medical Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Range Bank | Wisconsin Medical Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 (stronger) | 79 |
| Capital cushion | 58 | 74 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 93 |
| Earnings | 79 (stronger) | 51 |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 | 90 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 77th | 62nd |
| Total assets | $604.1M | $15.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $521.5M | $13.8M |
| Capital ratio | 10.84% | 12.39% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.21% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | -0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.47% (stronger) | 0.79% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.4% | 70.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.0% | 3.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.6% | — |
Range Bank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Range Bank leads on 4 and Wisconsin Medical Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.