Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Reading Co-operative Bank vs Alpha Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Reading Co-operative Bank | Alpha Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 56 | 97 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 23 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 95 |
| Earnings | 37 | 99 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 47 | 91 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 15th | 98th |
| Total assets | $1.2B | $35.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.0B | $28.2M |
| Capital ratio | 7.35% | 18.78% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.14% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.08% | 0.06% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.42% | 1.97% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.9% | 69.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 31.0% | 0.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 13.2% | — |
Alpha Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Reading Co-operative Bank leads on 1 and Alpha Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.