Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Regions Bank vs First Progressive Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Regions Bank | First Progressive Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 (stronger) | 51 |
| Capital cushion | 45 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 21 |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 (stronger) | 54 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 91 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 73rd | 10th |
| Total assets | $159.8B | $31.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $131.8B | $22.7M |
| Capital ratio | 9.50% | 28.01% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.93% (stronger) | 3.82% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.47% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.46% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 74.6% | 45.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.2% (stronger) | 56.9% |
| Offices | 1,224 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 3,181 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 24.1 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 43.1% | — |
Regions Bank has the higher TellerScore (64 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Regions Bank leads on 4 and First Progressive Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.