Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Regions Bank vs RiverBank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Regions Bank | RiverBank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 (stronger) | 48 |
| Capital cushion | 45 | 72 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 69 |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 (stronger) | 58 |
| Peer percentile | 73rd | 6th |
| Total assets | $159.8B | $174.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $131.8B | $150.4M |
| Capital ratio | 9.50% | 12.18% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.93% (stronger) | 3.42% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.47% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.46% (stronger) | 1.23% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 74.6% (stronger) | 89.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.2% | 35.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1,224 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 3,184 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 24.2 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 43.1% | — |
Regions Bank has the higher TellerScore (64 vs 48). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Regions Bank leads on 4 and RiverBank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.