TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union vs Genuine Parts Credit Union

Credit union

Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union

Coosa, Georgia · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Genuine Parts Credit Union

Norcross, Georgia · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureRome Kraft Employees Credit UnionGenuine Parts Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)87
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality84100 (stronger)
Earnings95 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity63100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage97100 (stronger)
Peer percentile87th83rd
Total assets$23.0M$19.5M
Deposits / shares$17.3M$6.2M
Capital ratio24.71%79.20% (stronger)
Problem loans0.49%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.13% (stronger)3.33%
Return on assets1.88% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits97.4%36.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits9.5%0.0% (stronger)
Offices23
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 87). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union leads on 3 and Genuine Parts Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions