Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union vs Mt. Zion Credit Union
Credit union
Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union
Coosa, Georgia · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union | Mt. Zion Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 74 |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 84 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 87th | 49th |
| Total assets | $23.0M | $428K |
| Deposits / shares | $17.3M | $347K |
| Capital ratio | 24.71% (stronger) | 18.91% |
| Problem loans | 0.49% (stronger) | 3.97% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.13% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.88% | 3.93% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 97.4% | 22.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.5% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rome Kraft Employees Credit Union leads on 3 and Mt. Zion Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.