Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
San Luis Valley Federal Bank vs Wings Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | San Luis Valley Federal Bank | Wings Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 68 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 65 (stronger) | 39 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 (stronger) | 60 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 60th |
| Total assets | $390.2M | $19.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $317.9M | $16.0B |
| Capital ratio | 17.98% (stronger) | 11.84% |
| Problem loans | 0.15% (stronger) | 0.64% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.45% |
| Return on assets | 1.13% (stronger) | 0.47% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.4% (stronger) | 100.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.6% | 8.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 88 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
San Luis Valley Federal Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), San Luis Valley Federal Bank leads on 6 and Wings Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.