TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sargent Federal Credit Union vs None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Sargent Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

68of 100
Moderate

Credit union

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Suitland, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSargent Federal Credit UnionNone Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6899 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality096 (stronger)
Earnings88100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage57100 (stronger)
Peer percentile36th99th
Total assets$258K$27.9M
Deposits / shares$208K$22.3M
Capital ratio16.32%20.14% (stronger)
Problem loans22.05%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-2.38% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets1.69%2.07% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits24.3%11.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.9%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sargent Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions