TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sea Comm Federal Credit Union vs Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Sea Comm Federal Credit Union

Massena, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union

Massena, New York · Under $100 million in assets

83of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSea Comm Federal Credit UnionTwin Rivers Federal Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)83
Capital cushion100 (stronger)81
Loan quality7993 (stronger)
Earnings77 (stronger)53
Funding & liquidity92100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9699 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th72nd
Total assets$777.3M$39.2M
Deposits / shares$651.4M$35.2M
Capital ratio17.96% (stronger)13.07%
Problem loans0.63%0.22% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.25% (stronger)1.19%
Return on assets1.42% (stronger)0.84%
Loans ÷ deposits68.0%45.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits5.5%3.1% (stronger)
Offices92
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Sea Comm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sea Comm Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Twin Rivers Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions