Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Sei Federal Credit Union vs Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Sei Federal Credit Union | Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 51 | 59 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 33 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 77 (stronger) | 19 |
| Earnings | 23 | 27 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 | 72 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 69 | 83 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 10th | 20th |
| Total assets | $33.4M | $574K |
| Deposits / shares | $30.6M | $483K |
| Capital ratio | 8.26% | 15.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.68% (stronger) | 2.42% |
| Net charge-offs | 1.22% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.06% | 0.17% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.2% | 87.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 1.9% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (59 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sei Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Mini-Cassia Empl. Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.