TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union vs Medina County Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union

Shaker Heights, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Credit union

Medina County Federal Credit Union

Wadsworth, Ohio · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureShaker Heights Federal Credit UnionMedina County Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5488 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)73
Loan quality097 (stronger)
Earnings2088 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)93
Problem-loan coverage5399 (stronger)
Peer percentile13th92nd
Total assets$1.2M$151.3M
Deposits / shares$912K$135.6M
Capital ratio24.32% (stronger)12.33%
Problem loans15.96%0.09% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets0.01%1.69% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits50.5% (stronger)67.5%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.3%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Medina County Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Medina County Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions