Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union vs Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union
Shaker Heights, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union
Cincinnati, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union | Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 54 | 64 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 46 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 20 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 53 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 13th | 28th |
| Total assets | $1.2M | $142K |
| Deposits / shares | $912K | $129K |
| Capital ratio | 24.32% (stronger) | 9.59% |
| Problem loans | 15.96% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.01% (stronger) | -0.54% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 50.5% | 6.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (64 vs 54). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.