Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union vs Wiremen'S Credit Union
Credit union
Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union
Shaker Heights, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union | Wiremen'S Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 54 | 92 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 20 | 63 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 53 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 13th | 92nd |
| Total assets | $1.2M | $40.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $912K | $33.5M |
| Capital ratio | 24.32% (stronger) | 17.01% |
| Problem loans | 15.96% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.08% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.01% | 1.07% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 50.5% (stronger) | 51.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Wiremen'S Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 54). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Shaker Heights Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Wiremen'S Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.