Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Sierra Pacific Federal Credit Union vs Greater Nevada Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Sierra Pacific Federal Credit Union | Greater Nevada Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 (stronger) | 22 |
| Capital cushion | 86 (stronger) | 0 |
| Loan quality | 81 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 61 (stronger) | 50 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 79 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 0 |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 0th |
| Total assets | $189.4M | $1.7B |
| Deposits / shares | $163.4M | $1.6B |
| Capital ratio | 13.57% (stronger) | 3.50% |
| Problem loans | 0.57% (stronger) | 3.98% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.33% (stronger) | 1.38% |
| Return on assets | 1.03% (stronger) | 0.74% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 57.3% (stronger) | 81.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.0% (stronger) | 8.1% |
| Offices | 4 | 14 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Sierra Pacific Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 22). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sierra Pacific Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Greater Nevada Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.