TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Smw 104 Federal Credit Union vs Patelco Credit Union

Credit union

Smw 104 Federal Credit Union

Livermore, California · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Patelco Credit Union

Dublin, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

60of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureSmw 104 Federal Credit UnionPatelco Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)60
Capital cushion77 (stronger)55
Loan quality89 (stronger)66
Earnings95 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)74
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)85
Peer percentile94th25th
Total assets$117.9M$9.8B
Deposits / shares$102.4M$8.2B
Capital ratio12.65% (stronger)10.49%
Problem loans0.32% (stronger)1.03%
Net charge-offs0.44% (stronger)0.58%
Return on assets1.88% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits53.2% (stronger)86.3%
Uninsured deposits1.7% (stronger)6.2%
Offices135
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—16.7%

Smw 104 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Smw 104 Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Patelco Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions