TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Smw 104 Federal Credit Union vs United Association Credit Union

Credit union

Smw 104 Federal Credit Union

Livermore, California · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

United Association Credit Union

Concord, California · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSmw 104 Federal Credit UnionUnited Association Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)80
Capital cushion77100 (stronger)
Loan quality89 (stronger)85
Earnings95 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)98
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)97
Peer percentile94th65th
Total assets$117.9M$14.3M
Deposits / shares$102.4M$11.8M
Capital ratio12.65%17.30% (stronger)
Problem loans0.32% (stronger)0.45%
Net charge-offs0.44%-0.02% (stronger)
Return on assets1.88% (stronger)0.02%
Loans ÷ deposits53.2% (stronger)62.3%
Uninsured deposits1.7%1.7% (stronger)
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Smw 104 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Smw 104 Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and United Association Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions