Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Sullivan Bank vs The Nodaway Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Sullivan Bank | The Nodaway Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 38 | 66 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 52 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 65 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 52 | 80 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 71 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 9th | 98th |
| Total assets | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 8.75% | 11.56% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.45% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | -0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.13% | 2.23% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 95.7% | 73.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.2% | 21.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 11 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 5.8% |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sullivan Bank leads on 0 and The Nodaway Valley Bank on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.