TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union vs Pace Resources Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

90of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Pace Resources Federal Credit Union

York, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSusquehanna Valley Federal Credit UnionPace Resources Federal Credit Union
TellerScore90 (stronger)80
Capital cushion73100 (stronger)
Loan quality98 (stronger)66
Earnings94 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)97
Peer percentile89th65th
Total assets$86.9M$6.5M
Deposits / shares$76.4M$5.3M
Capital ratio12.29%17.86% (stronger)
Problem loans0.07% (stronger)1.01%
Net charge-offs0.07%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.84% (stronger)0.58%
Loans ÷ deposits58.7%33.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits1.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Pace Resources Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions