TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union vs White Rose Credit Union

Credit union

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

90of 100
Very strong

Credit union

White Rose Credit Union

York, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureSusquehanna Valley Federal Credit UnionWhite Rose Credit Union
TellerScore90 (stronger)66
Capital cushion73 (stronger)39
Loan quality98 (stronger)88
Earnings94 (stronger)40
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)96
Peer percentile89th37th
Total assets$86.9M$115.5M
Deposits / shares$76.4M$104.3M
Capital ratio12.29% (stronger)8.91%
Problem loans0.07% (stronger)0.35%
Net charge-offs0.07% (stronger)0.61%
Return on assets1.84% (stronger)0.51%
Loans ÷ deposits58.7%53.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits1.7% (stronger)2.0%
Offices16
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—19.7%

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and White Rose Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions