Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
TexasBank vs First National Bank of Burleson
Metric by metric
| Measure | TexasBank | First National Bank of Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 79 (stronger) | 76 |
| Loan quality | 86 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 37 | 76 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 90th | 94th |
| Total assets | $2.5B | $250.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.0B | $218.6M |
| Capital ratio | 12.87% (stronger) | 12.58% |
| Problem loans | 0.41% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.33% | 2.44% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 105.3% | 46.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 30.9% (stronger) | 37.0% |
| Offices | 17 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
First National Bank of Burleson has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), TexasBank leads on 2 and First National Bank of Burleson on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.