TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

The Bank of East Asia Ltd. vs Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Bank

The Bank of East Asia Ltd.

New York, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

41of 100
Below average

Credit union

Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureThe Bank of East Asia Ltd.Wakefern Federal Credit Union
TellerScore4199 (stronger)
Capital cushion0100 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)96
Earnings20100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity5099 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage—100
Peer percentile3rd99th
Total assets$449.6M$12.0M
Deposits / shares$19.7M$9.1M
Capital ratio0.00%24.31% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.13%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.09%
Return on assets0.00%2.03% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits2008.9%42.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)16.4%
Offices01
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 41). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of East Asia Ltd. leads on 3 and Wakefern Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions