Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Bank of Old Monroe vs Bank of Kampsville
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Bank of Old Monroe | Bank of Kampsville |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 | 91 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 55 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 85 (stronger) | 57 |
| Funding & liquidity | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 96th |
| Total assets | $994.6M | $134.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $916.6M | $110.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.55% | 17.41% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.04% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 1.62% (stronger) | 0.93% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.7% | 42.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.0% | 7.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 27.6% |
Bank of Kampsville has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Old Monroe leads on 3 and Bank of Kampsville on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.