Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Glen Burnie Mutual Savings Bank vs BayVanguard Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Glen Burnie Mutual Savings Bank | BayVanguard Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 56 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 38 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 77 | 84 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 29 | 60 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 71 (stronger) | 52 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 13th | 77th |
| Total assets | $103.9M | $868.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $93.8M | $689.1M |
| Capital ratio | 8.80% | 17.13% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.69% | 0.48% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.23% | 1.01% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.0% (stronger) | 102.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 8.7% (stronger) | 20.7% |
| Offices | 1 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.3% |
BayVanguard Bank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Glen Burnie Mutual Savings Bank leads on 2 and BayVanguard Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.