Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Nodaway Valley Bank vs Sterling Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Nodaway Valley Bank | Sterling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 78 |
| Capital cushion | 66 (stronger) | 61 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 88 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 85 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 77 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 86th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 11.56% (stronger) | 11.14% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.35% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.04% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Return on assets | 2.23% (stronger) | 1.63% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.3% (stronger) | 77.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% | 21.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 16 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | 14.3% |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Nodaway Valley Bank leads on 6 and Sterling Bank on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.