Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Nodaway Valley Bank vs TBO Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Nodaway Valley Bank | TBO Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 50 |
| Capital cushion | 66 (stronger) | 59 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 44 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 50 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 25 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 79 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 7th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $224.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $195.8M |
| Capital ratio | 11.56% (stronger) | 10.87% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.69% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.04% (stronger) | 34.35% |
| Return on assets | 2.23% (stronger) | 0.74% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.3% (stronger) | 88.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% (stronger) | 57.8% |
| Offices | 9 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | — |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 50). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Nodaway Valley Bank leads on 7 and TBO Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.