Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Nodaway Valley Bank vs The Bendena State Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Nodaway Valley Bank | The Bendena State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 77 |
| Capital cushion | 66 (stronger) | 50 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 85 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 68 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 68th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $131.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $114.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.56% (stronger) | 9.96% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.04% (stronger) | -0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.23% (stronger) | 1.64% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.3% (stronger) | 74.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% (stronger) | 30.6% |
| Offices | 9 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | 8.5% |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 77). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Nodaway Valley Bank leads on 6 and The Bendena State Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.