Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Park National Bank vs The Hocking Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Park National Bank | The Hocking Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 77 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 53 | 64 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 71 | 82 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 85 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 93 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 79th | 68th |
| Total assets | $12.6B | $354.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $10.8B | $312.0M |
| Capital ratio | 10.33% | 11.44% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.86% | 0.54% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.11% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.99% (stronger) | 1.37% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.2% | 65.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.3% (stronger) | 23.3% |
| Offices | 104 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 19.0% | — |
The Hocking Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Park National Bank leads on 2 and The Hocking Valley Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.