TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toledo Fire Fighters Federal Credit Union vs M.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Toledo Fire Fighters Federal Credit Union

Toledo, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

95of 100
Very strong

Credit union

M.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureToledo Fire Fighters Federal Credit UnionM.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union
TellerScore95 (stronger)74
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality89 (stronger)0
Earnings90100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)90
Peer percentile96th49th
Total assets$45.5M$167K
Deposits / shares$37.4M$130K
Capital ratio17.84%22.34% (stronger)
Problem loans0.34% (stronger)8.20%
Net charge-offs0.58%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.75%2.14% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits50.6%19.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.2%0.0% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Toledo Fire Fighters Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (95 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toledo Fire Fighters Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and M.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions