TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs Blaze Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Blaze Credit Union

Falcon Heights, Minnesota · $1 billion – $10 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionBlaze Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)61
Capital cushion95 (stronger)38
Loan quality81 (stronger)66
Earnings73 (stronger)54
Funding & liquidity7293 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)87
Peer percentile75th27th
Total assets$41.5M$4.8B
Deposits / shares$34.9M$4.1B
Capital ratio14.46% (stronger)8.76%
Problem loans0.56% (stronger)1.02%
Net charge-offs0.30% (stronger)0.46%
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)0.84%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0%67.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.1% (stronger)7.8%
Offices130
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—14.3%

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Blaze Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions